Substance Abuse Archives - CED Foundation

Substance Abuse

Motives for cannabis use in high-risk adolescent users

In Summary

A recent article has revealed some of the motives behind adolescent cannabis abuse. Researchers found that cannabis is misused as a coping mechanism in individual adolescents who internalized behavioral problems which then leads to the development of a number of cannabis dependence symptoms. Participants who reported cannabis use for enhancement, social, and conformity purposes did not report similar issues with dependency. The gathered data suggests that the motivation behind cannabis use should be considered when addressing an individual’s use and that targeted intervention tools should focus on the motivation of drug abuse to better educate at-risk youth.

This article emphasizes the need to educate adolescents on the medical benefits and proper use of cannabis before it can be abused. If at-risk youth are using cannabis to mitigate feelings of anxiety they may be worsening their symptoms as tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the most abundant psychoactive component of cannabis, is known to exacerbate anxiety. If they knew about cannabidiol (CBD), which is a non-psychoactive cannabinoid, which is readily available in most states within the United States and has been beneficial for most people dealing with anxiety. Cannabinoids, terpenes, and flavonoids provide a myriad of medical benefits but a lack of education may allow teenagers to misuse those substances, including legal products, and worsen their symptoms, leading to continued misuse and may prevent them from seeking medical help for their ailments.

The study is available for review or download here

Motives-for-Cannabis-Use-in-High-Risk-Adolescent-Users Download

View more studies like this in the CED Foundation Archive

To explore related information, click the keywords below:

Orbitofrontal cortex volume prospectively predicts cannabis and other substance use onset in adolescents

In Summary:

Researchers have recently unveiled that the volume of the lateral orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is able to predict future substance use in adolescents. Individuals were followed for 13 years after undergoing magnetic functional resonance imaging and surveyed for cannabis and alcohol use. Interesting the authors chose to utilize those who had used cannabis, but in limited quantities, as a control group instead of including them in their cannabis users group. Similarly, the alcohol only group of participants also included those who used cannabis multiple times within the past year. Nevertheless, the authors conclude that the size of the lateral OFC is able to predict drug use in adolescents although not without admitting the need for replication and validity.

This paper is a perfect example of biased information within the medical community. Bias is inherent, there is no way around it, but it is the duty of researchers to publish their findings while remaining as objective as possible. The grouping and subsequent statistical analysis of this data mentioned in the featured article are rather odd considering their terminology and broad claims. This may be due to the views of the organization funding the research, or the bias of the research team, but the limitations of this study should have been a larger factor, such as the odd groupings and the fact that this research took place in a state where cannabis use is legal for recreational and medical use. Scientists have an obligation to pursue the truth and not extrapolate their findings to fit their personal agenda. A slew of articles out there suffer from cherry-picking statistics and the extrapolation of data; readers and media outlets who popularize findings should take care to nitpick the methodology and demographics of studies.